On October 25, an FDA Advisory Panel endorsed the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for children ages 5-11 years. They took this action, despite presentations by experts, who raised concerns over the lack of safety and efficacy of the jabs and nearly 140k comments received from the public with many opposed to the expansion of vaccines to young children. According to the CDC’s own website, for example, “Cases of myocarditis reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) have occurred: After mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna), especially in male adolescents and young adults.”
Based on CDC’s own data, the risk of death from COVD for children is extremely low. Why vaccinate them? Pfizer argued children should be vaccinated to prevent transmission – to whom? – to adults? Is this latest vaccine volley intended to protect adults at the expense of our children?
“We’re never going to know how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it. That’s the way it is,” explained Dr. Eric Ruben, who sits on the FDA Advisory Panel.
The FDA has yet formally to authorize the vaccine, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) must also weigh-in with its own recommendation. If approved, which it is expected to do in early November, states like California will immediately begin to make the inoculations mandatory for schools —leaving little room for religious accommodations or medical exemptions.
And, reports of adverse reactions to the vaccine have been suppressed. Where censorship exists, how can consent be informed? The voices of those injured by the vaccine need to be heard.
Join us at 3 p.m. EDT, Wednesday, November 3 to hear uncensored accounts of those who have suffered serious injuries from the jab, and for an important conversation on Covid-19 vaccine mandates for children.