webinar register page

Banner with names of speakers, zoom details, institutions involved, and link to the main website of the event: jtrialerror.com/debate
Open Science rankings: yes, no, or not this way? A debate on developing and implementing transparency metrics.
The Journal of Trial and Error is proud to present an exciting and timely event: a three-way debate on the topic of Open Science metrics, specifically, transparency metrics. Should we develop these metrics? What purposes do they fulfil? How should Open Science practices be encouraged? Are (transparency) rankings the best solution? These questions and more will be addressed in a dynamic and interactive debate with three researchers of different backgrounds: Etienne LeBel (Independent Meta-Scientist and founder of ERC-funded project ‘Curate Science’), Sarah de Rijcke (Professor of Science and Evaluation Studies and director of the Centre for Science and Technology Studies at Leiden University), and Juliëtte Schaafsma (Professor of Cultural Psychology at Tilburg University and fierce critic of rankings and audits). This is an event organized by the Journal of Trial and Error, and supported by the Open Science Community Tilburg, the Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS, Leiden University), and the Open Science Community Utrecht.

Abstract, debate format, and more information: https://www.jtrialerror.com/debate/

Jun 15, 2021 03:30 PM in Brussels

Logo. JOTE. Journal of Trial and Error.
Webinar is over, you cannot register now. If you have any questions, please contact Webinar host: Max Bautista Perpinyà.