Skip to main content

Zoom Logo

IABC Staff's Personal Meeting Room (Shared screen with speaker view)
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:14:34 Minas: Hello, sorry I can’t have the video on. Seems hearing the audio well!
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:14:47 Vladimir.Vinogradov: Good morning
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:16:31 jwile: can't hear Lynn very well.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:16:32 Susan: Cant hear
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:16:42 hmjohnson: Yes, there seems to be static on the line
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:16:52 SteeleS2: No audio
Nina TB
16:53
Can't hear as well
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:16:54 ryanst: Scratchy audio
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:17:03 jwile: some people are not muted. Lynn is inaudible.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:17:18 fathima: ver scratchy audio
IABC Staff
17:19
Please place your audio on mute
Maliha Aqeel
17:29
I can hear, but there's horrible static while Lynn is speaking.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:17:31 Vladimir.Vinogradov: could you please speak litl bit more louder?
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:17:32 toshha: Please have Lynn check her microphone ... difficult to hear her
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:19:09 ktraboul: static while Lynn is speaking
Adam Brayford
19:26
Yes static during speaking.
IABC Staff
19:28
Hi everyone! Please place your phones on mute
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:19:38 jwile: still can't hear Lynn very well. Heavy static. Please speak up!!!
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:19:53 charanlumley: Yes bad sound quality…
IABC Staff
20:27
Jludwig please mute your audio
IABC Staff
21:02
Everyone - please mute your audio - we still have a few folks with unmuted video
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:21:22 jwile: if the sound quality doesn't improve I don't see any point in continuing.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:21:42 SteeleS2: ditto
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:22:02 probertson: My sound is adequate - static does not interfere that much
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:22:37 Rajiv: Do we ask questipons at the end or as you go through it?
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:22:52 probertson: sound is good now
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:23:13 lbarter: please post questions throughout
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:24:54 ktraboul: one can go back in the system?
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:25:24 Rajiv: Is an entry (the same entry) sent to MORE than 2 evaluators?
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:26:44 jwile: I can hear one presenter but can't hear Lynn.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:26:50 probertson: static is back but the problem is with Lynn's microphone I think
Cheryl Fletcher
27:53
Sincere apologies - I thought we were automatically on mute - have never been on one of these where we weren't muted. :)
Unknown Speaker
00:00
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:28:37 iPad: we can hear you
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:28:43 Nekolina: No it's a problem with the line
IABC Staff
29:04
Hi all - please ask any questions through the chat functionality
IABC Staff
29:13
rather than via audio
IABC Staff
29:16
thank you!
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:29:49 ktraboul: can candidates dispute the results?
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:30:37 Kathleen: Are people agreeing that they've read the compliance rules when they submit? I find many entries simply do not seem aware of the requirements the judges are asked to judge.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:30:46 Minas: Is there a double confirmation feature between the evaluating pairs, namely the entry gets final score after both evaluators press confirm??\
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:31:01 Rajiv: Will we get the slides after? (Apart from the recording)
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:32:29 Kathleen: Do all of the comments go to the entrants?
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:33:04 ryanst: If the same written submission is made in multiple categories, then we should expect that the content of the submission should be written specifically for each category, as opposed to a mere cut and paste of the same entry document to both categories? Please verify. The entry could be a winner in a category and fail in the second category.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:33:22 Rajiv: So, once each evaluator inputs their score, we do a reconciliation and then input the final score in a separate box?
Maliha Aqeel
33:25
Award Force doesn't ave capability to show one reconciled score to the judges
Jim Shaffer
35:02
About how much time do you expect this to consume throughout the process--so we have a sense of our commitment.
Jim Shaffer
36:29
Are you sending all of this out in a written document. It's a big dump. It may be good for us to look over all of this and then have another meeting
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:36:36 toshha: Does the entrant see each evaluator's scores or the combined score? Last year we were asked to modify our comments based on the combined score, but if the entrant sees individual scores, the unique perspectives of each evaluator may make more sense in the event of evaluator disagreement.
Cheryl Fletcher
36:52
I don't about others' experience but I find most take an average of 45-60 minutes
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:37:11 Tanya: I agree - it's about an hour per entry.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:37:12 Kathleen: I think the terrible entries take much longer!
Jim Shaffer
37:43
Each gets 6 or 7 entries? Is that what you said? Or did you say 60-70?
Maliha Aqeel
37:57
6 or 7 entries.
Maliha Aqeel
38:18
At least that's what I heard about the numbers ahead of the BRP.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:38:18 Rajiv: Number of entries per pair (average)?
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:38:22 SteeleS2: When do we get the entries to judge and what is the deadline? Sorry, I have no audio so this may have already been covered.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:39:16 Nekolina: Can you advance the slide
IABC Staff
39:18
6 or 7 entries per person
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:39:44 Nekolina: We're not seeing the rubrics slide
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:39:54 jwile: just to clarify. The judges can see each other's scores when they are judging and that helps them reach a consensus score. The entrant only receives the final score - is this correct? Also, the entrant does not see the judges;' names - can you confirm that?
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:40:03 Rajiv: Is it advisable or recommended to get into decimals?
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:40:14 Rajiv: ie. 4.5 2.6 etc.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:40:15 SIOBHAN O'SHEA: Are the rubrics this year the same as last year? Any updates?
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:40:46 maryannmccauley: I see no reference to measurable objectives in the rubric. Have we abandoned measurable objectives as a measure of excellence?
IABC Staff
40:47
rubrics are the ssame as last year
IABC Staff
41:09
scores will be in whole and half numbers - 1 1.5 2 2.5 etc.
IABC Staff
41:24
entrants cannot see the judges names
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:41:25 Rajiv: A comment: General feedback can be about 'What can you keep' and 'what can be improved'
IABC Staff
41:47
the entrant only sees the final score
Jim Shaffer
43:13
Is there more focus this year on results vs. activity? That's a needed shift that a lot of us are encouraging. Some of the measures still seem soft.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:45:05 Summer: apologies if this has already been addressed - can Award Force be accessed well from an iPad?
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:45:24 scpr: How do we find out who our Blue Ribbon Chair is?
IABC Staff
45:44
I actually don't know if award force will work on an ipad - I'll test it out later today and let you know!
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:45:54 Summer: thank you!
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:45:58 c.pierroz: Just wanted to qualify the student entries - do these qualify for the same merit and excellence awards as all other entries?
Allison fifield
47:01
Do you know the date for the Edmonton face-to-face?
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:47:08 LynchM: How many judges review an entry?
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:47:09 drhamilton-attwell: What constitute or a 6 or 7 output objective?
Kim Walters
47:16
What is the timeframe (dates) for beginning and completing virtual judging?
IABC Staff
47:27
Edmonton is March 3
IABC Staff
47:34
2 judges review each entry
Allison fifield
47:42
Thanks :)
Jim Shaffer
47:44
Clarification. Strong measurement can be around process and activity versus "did it sell more beer" or reduce on tme delivery, etc.
Kim Walters
48:08
Thank you.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:49:46 drhamilton-attwell: I am concerned about the 5/6 rubrics. I can not see what is the difference, except being very subject.
Cindy Schmieg
49:50
Evaluators to BRPs should have 10+ years experience in the field. Evaluators use their expertise to apply the rubrics. As the primer on goals & objectives in the Evaluating Excellence Guide explain outputs vs. outcomes.
Maliha Aqeel
52:03
Thank you.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:52:03 scpr: Where can we access the Evaluating Excellence Guide?
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:52:07 c.pierroz: How long is part 2?
Brad Whitworth
52:29
Good session. Thanks all! See (some of you) in San Francisco.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:52:52 iPad: San Diego you mean
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:52:57 ktraboul: Thank you.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
00:54:50 Kathleen: If they ABSOLUTELY do not provide the information, what is your score?
Jim Shaffer
55:48
Will we be given entries that capitalize on our individual experience/expertise? I may know little about A but a lot about B.
Jim Shaffer
01:00:50
You can increase awareness of a product and not sell more of it. Is the goal to sell more product or make people aware? Awareness is an output. Sell more product is an outcome
IABC Staff
01:04:00
the evaluating excellence guides are available on the gold quill website under resources
Unknown Speaker
00:00
01:04:09 probertson: I would not agree- if the goal is to increase awareness (for whatever reason- maybe to break into a new market?) then measuring awareness is important. YOu need a baseline then show increase.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
01:06:54 Summer: If we are traveling to another city for the panel, will there be any suggestions/discounts for accomodation and other events to attend?
IABC Staff
01:07:57
Good question Summer! I would suggest reaching out to your Blue Ribbon Panel chair for this kind of information.
Unknown Speaker
00:00
01:08:39 Summer: Thank you. Looking forward to it!
Unknown Speaker
00:00
01:09:03 Rajiv: When do we get to hear about who are partnered? Is that also on 4th Feb?
Allison fifield
01:09:46
Thank you!
Unknown Speaker
00:00
01:09:46 jwile: can we indicate if we would like to be partnered with a particular person