Zoom Logo

Ecosystem Foundry WG / Trust over IP Foundation - Shared screen with speaker view
Karl Kneis
20:18
If anyone has feedback or questions to share through audio please use the raise hand feature. Thank you.
Jim St.Clair
22:50
great participation!
Michael Shea
27:40
someone needs to mute their line
Drummond Reed
31:01
I’m going to point Victor at the Internet of Education TF on the ToIP wiki: https://wiki.trustoverip.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=66102
Taylor Kendal
33:30
Thanks Drummond - Here’s another resource aimed at a broader audience. http://internetofeducation.org
Drummond Reed
33:52
Taylor! You’re the guy who can help Victor the most here.
Taylor Kendal
35:01
@Victor, happy to connect - taylor@learningeconomy.io
Victor Syntez
35:14
Will do!
Drummond Reed
35:36
Taylor, is the http://internetofeducation.org link on the IoE TF wiki page?
Taylor Kendal
36:40
@DR It’s not since we are still in “soft launch” but will be :)
Drummond Reed
37:02
Cool. Please do add it to the wiki when u r ready.
Drummond Reed
37:20
Notice the overwhelming Canadian presence here today? What’s in the water up there that they are always leading in digital identity?? ;-)
Drummond Reed
37:30
(or is it the beer ;-)
Michael Shea
37:46
no, the hockey….
Karen Hand
37:51
the beer for sure, we have real beer ;0
Drummond Reed
38:20
Oh, of course, the hockey! They are skating to where the credentials are going!!
sankarshan
39:23
(All that is needed is Scott’s Implementation Plan and we’ll have this sorted)
Victor Syntez
39:31
in BC ot
Victor Syntez
39:38
it's more soccer passes))
Taylor Kendal
40:45
Someone needs to meme-ify that! CA: skating to where creds and SSI are going.
Trust over IP Foundation Zoom 1
41:22
Excellent and very encouraging set of topics and presentations here. Apologies to have to jump off the call. -David
Karen Hand
42:38
Carly's idea of creating material for researchers to apply for funding directed specifically to SSI is important and a great idea
Michael Shea
44:11
+1 to the idea
Drummond Reed
44:29
It’s really a great use of DIDs. https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/
Scott Whitmire
50:39
I still don’t agree that “Transform” can be a phase. Transform is something you do TO an ecosystem, and those actions are or should be continuous.
Drummond Reed
54:51
One question I can just type in chat: is the Solution Pack a deliverable from this WG?
Karen Hand
57:14
Steve's presentation provides a very logical framework and I can see the application in our own projects. I see it as an iterative roadmap.
Scott Perry
57:52
Optimize may be a better term than transform
Scott Whitmire
01:00:08
Keep in mind that the primary artifacts in layer are a business model and corresponding governance framework. There might not be any identifiable software beyond layer 3.
Scott Whitmire
01:00:36
“artifacts in layer 4” That’s important.
Carly Huitema
01:01:05
+1 similar artifacts that Steve mentions in the package were similar to what I was thinking would be outputs of the researcher identifiers
Scott Whitmire
01:05:01
Like any partnership, provisions for dissolution would have to be included in the governance framework.
Scott Whitmire
01:05:24
Partners will come and go all the time. There need to be rules for dealing with that.
Ken Adler
01:07:51
+1 Scott
Victor Syntez
01:08:11
+1 Scott
Steve Magennis
01:08:51
@scott, yes we're just talking about guidance for this here
Eric Drury
01:09:47
Seems very similar to consortium model?
Scott Whitmire
01:10:22
+1 Eric. Consortium is probably a good name for it.
Paul Knowles
01:10:42
Yes, consortiums seem important moving forward.