Handout https://www.digitalhealthcrc.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/CriticalReadingHandout.pdf

Millie from Newcastle looking for water in western NSW using geophysics!

Sydney, Fidelity of implementation of Inquiry learning in IBPYP classroom. MOther of 23 year old twins.

Hi all, i’m Kate from SA-Adelaide, and researching palliative care bereavement support, and on the lawn mowing theme, i am using a push lawnmower for exercise :)

Hello, this is Neha. I am pursuing my PhD with UTS and currently working as a Lecturer with various universities in Sydney.

Hi everyone, I’m study at Flinders university (Adelaide). My project is focusing on PTSD and meta-awareness :)

Hi, my name is Macey, I am in Canberra, currently completing my PhD in nursing, looking at partnership nursing.

Sorry forgot to mention my topic: Big data analytics

To be effective

for my literature review!

to not miss relevant data

To help me scan through a large amount of literature quickly

I want to fully understand the issues surrounding my topic

To analyse the gaps in research

To judge the quality of previous research

to improve future research/experiment

yes!

yes, definitely use it to construct my own methods

Will these slides be available afterwards?

Thank you!

making connections

Deeper thought and understandig

assess the strengths and weaknesses of the article

interpretation

To create a new understanding by combining literature/research

Analysis

to analyse different facts

yes looks ideal

perfect

››thank you it is what i am aiming for though easy to get lost in the process

I really like this it makes sense thank you

All good here

Very clear. Thanks

method, assumptions, participants

overreaching conclusions based on limited data collection

the experience of the target group

Data, methods and interpretation of results

yes

Alignment between methods and theoretical models

objective methodology result

qual data and participants,

yes

method used, models/ framework, (?)

education

ag research

geoscience

Archaeology

science - nanotechnology

Soil Science

Cyber Security, Internet of Things...

social history

Ecological relevance & statistical significance

woman-centredness, a feminist lens

Personal touch

accuracy, school/classroom applications and voice of educators

accessible, duty of care, less theory, applicability

Real-world applicability, Accuracy...

recnency probably a factor too

Indigenous perspectives/ inclusion, applicability for the field

social justice, real world applicability

Model generation: Experimental or Theoretical

psychometric sound (validity and reliability)?

Bias present

cost effectiveness, applicability, accuracy, time

https://www.digitalhealthcrc.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/CriticalReadingHandout.pdf

target audience, age, location, risk level, disease type

attitude toward cancer predictive in groups if non high rik women and men to analyse the factors that may influence their intenion to use these tes. Women are more motivated to get genetic testing

to investigate the attitudes toward cancer predictive genetic testing in a group of non-high-risk women and men and to analyze the factors that may influence their intention to use these tests.

Separate questionnaires for males and females, only outpatients and the use of non-high-risk patients

4 hospitals, age women and men between 30 -74, investigating attitudes towards testing

Non-high risk men and women, outpatients, 859 participants, face-to-face interviews, 30-74 ages

Paticipants 30 and 74 years

no participant had history of cancer

Focus on attitudes

attitude toward cancer predictive in groups , different questionnaire by gender, face-to face interviews, age

two different questionaires

investigated attitudes and what influences participants to use a test. Questionaire used - used stats and compared male and female

atritudes toward a certain testing type

clear

This implies reading more than one?

to investigate the attitudes, analyze the factors that may influence their intention, studied a sample, were asked to answer a questionnaire, descriptive statistics and univariate comparisons used..

age range - 50 to 80

They used different questionares - use the same questionnaire for both genders

different target participants, (someone who had that cancer in the family)

compaing different age groups within the seses - maybe women of 30 would do differently to one of 70 for example

qualitative interviews

Use the same questionnaire and study high risk patients

High-risk women and men

one gender group

Does the alternatives not refer to the choices of the writer?

Publishing in another journal

ok

Different types of cancer - one that affects both men and women

motivation and awareness

social demographic of people- not just government employees, and the education of participants

if women are more likely to get tested, this may be related to education given to women about their health

how gender, age, demographic influence people awareness on the risk of having cancer

alternative, to explore willingness/attitude to testing for those who are at higher risk, focussing on how to encourage testing (only if there is value in knowing of course), greater risk in this alternative, greater chance of benefit (based on testing with a purpose of reducing risk of disease), targeted to reduce development of illness

Two different questionairs - how can you compare the attitudes if there are different questionnaires? One questionnaire would be better

2 types of cancer, 2 types of gender, 2 types of quiz - difficult to compare...

alternative, changing the age range from 18 to 30, 31 to 50, 51 to 74. Coz at different generation they might have different education level.

(a general question) can we apply this 4-step process to the abstract only (at least for the first pass) before delving into the details? Or do you recommend reading the whole paper before starting this process?

yes, a version but more structured

I think so, not 100% sure until I tackle a new article

What happens when you are new to the subject? How can you effectively evaluate the strength and weakness?

great thanks!

need to read conclusions as well

Yes.

generally how long it takes to do a critical reading of a reasonably difficult paper?

Hi Cassily, I can see the applications to this for your example - the article I chose seems to be a lot more about the method development to solve a problem - method 1, method 2, optional extra to both methods allows issue to be somewhat resolved. For something like this is it okay to have a lot less choices than the example we went through together?

easier in own field

a new way of thinking

paper survey used to ask about service delivery resulting, in loss of ability to explore the role in depth, personal interview

Agreed about easier in own field

yes easier in own field

Could have used different thresholds in experiments. Point of view on the alternative is that it could significantly alter the results. Supportive evidence could be of using different models and more specific models

Its new and keeps me asking questions but it slows me down

yes it is easier in own feild

would we look critically at the aims of a study or just the choices?

thank you!

thank you. very helpful

Thank you!

Thank you

thank you very much

Thank you for the session

thank you it has been really helpful

Thank you

thank you

Many thanks

Thank you

Thank you Cassily :)

Thanks

great, thank you

Thank you so much.

Thank you

Thank you, Cassily!

Thank you so much!! This was super useful :)

Thanks heaps...

Thank you :)