Questions will be taken at the end of the presentation. Feel free to type your questions in the chat box to get in the queue.

Won’t you create possible conflict with buses and bikes in the tunnel and also with the stop and go processes when crossing over the trail?

Can you provide where we can obtain the studies done with the 2010-11 LightRail studies or actually send any pdf’s on these studies…to LandWatch or to me at samsca.gmail.com.

Concern: Since the SURF busway for the most part is West of the Monterey Regional Trail, thatdegrades the scenic route and coastal resources for hikers and bikers on thetrail

No issues with the endandered species act (Snowy Plovers) in and around this project??

You can raise your hand to be called on to ask your question or just type it in the chat box.

What was the reason for not pursuing a light-rail or trolley system using the existing upgraded southern pacific rails?

The SURF busway should REMAIN on the railway easement and MERGE into California AVE/Fremont interchange, NOT redirected next to MBSR into Hwy 1 onramp (new roundabout).KEEP it on the railway.Less disturbance, better planning and opportunity to improveLevel of Service at the Calif/Fremont interchange.

Here is a direct link to the Executive Summary of the 2010/11 Light Rail Alternatives Analysis: https://www.tamcmonterey.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/TAMC_MLB_AltAnalysis_ExecSummary.pdf

TAMC Light Rail Alternatives Analysis: https://www.tamcmonterey.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/TAMC_MLB_AltAnalysis_ExecSummary.pdf

The dual roundabouts is a good solution, especially with the underpass

On behalf of LandWatch, thank you very much for the excellent presentation! Michael DeLapa

Good presentation!

tahnks