
15:07
Aislinn Walsh, Performance & Accountability Analyst, Colorado Charter School Institute

15:27
Hi Ryan, did you also enter the Meeting ID?

15:48
1-699-900-6833Meeting ID: 922-737-202

15:56
I did not. I just clicked on the link

16:48
Hi Ryan, please try 669, not 699

17:04
so 669 900 6833

20:38
Kevin & Ryan, is that number working for you?

22:29
Please make sure that you are using "All panelists and attendees" to send comments so everyone can see.

22:41
Great!

28:25
I'm not seeing all comments.

30:29
Hi Ashley, if you just joined the chat, the Zoom will not show you previous comments. You should be able to see them here on out.

30:59
Also, if at the 85% percentile is 6.7%, that again makes 5% seem aggressive - but for reporting consistency across different types of metrics, I understand interest from that communications perspective

34:20
Feel free to send any comments or questions through this chat. Thank you!

38:53
How are K-12 or 6-8 school treated in these analyses?

39:06
sorry - 6=12 schools

43:00
Can you share the distribution again?

44:16
The distribution of just the rates or the change in chronic absenteeism rates?

44:26
The percent of schools who be exceeds/meets etc based on the change rating

45:06
Thanks.

45:25
You are welcome!

46:18
Have you had conversations about how this relates to other accountability metrics where Meets is the 50th percentile. This would mean only 40% would meet/exceed, right?

51:52
What would the distribution look like if the cuts were changed to meets 1%, approaching 1.1-3.9%, Does not meet 4% or higher

54:27
I was just thinking that if we are using this to set the normal distribution there would need to be more schools meeting

55:41
that would be closer to a normal distribution

01:01:59
I think the cut points need a little adjusting, similar to Michelle's proposal

01:02:16
I agree with Michelle

01:08:36
I meant more that this is just for those with less than 5% chronic absenteeism.

01:08:55
Sorry. How does this fit then with those who have a rate above 5%?

01:13:30
I am glad for this clarity - thank you.

01:16:04
Sorry to interrupt DPS people will need to leave soon as we have an all hands on deck meeting at 3 for the closure

01:16:42
Thank you for letting us know, Michelle!

01:17:33
Michelle, good luck with your plan. We had a meeting this morning with our superintendent and this decision is not easy for any school districts.

01:19:27
Thank you Kevin

01:25:01
Will three years of data be included? Or will you shift to just one once you have student-level data in 19-20?

01:25:46
I'm sorry, I have to step away for the remainder of the session.

01:27:05
Thank you for joining, Ashley! Have a good weekend!

01:27:22
I think 50% is a good too

01:27:31
I agree with 50%

01:27:48
So the inclusion/exclusion criteria is just for when/if you shift to student-level?

01:29:50
Please use the 1,2,3 system to vote on this. You may also use the Google form.

01:30:09
3

01:31:41
Same here. Stay safe and healthy everyone!