Zoom Logo

Governance Stack WG / Trust over IP Foundation - Shared screen with speaker view
sankarshan
12:16
Our meeting agenda today https://wiki.trustoverip.org/display/HOME/GSWG+Meeting+Page#GSWGMeetingPage-NA/EUMeeting-Thursday15October2020
sankarshan
18:56
I’ve added this bit to the page - if you would like an invite to this special meeting, please reach out to David.
Ken Adler
20:24
Invite: kadler@thoughtworks.com
RJ Reiser
20:52
RJ.reiser@kabn.network
jim stclair
21:04
jim.stclair@lumedic.io
jim stclair
21:46
oh wait, I got it already
Alex Tweeddale
21:56
alex@idworks.io
sankarshan
22:08
Oh dear! Along with attending 2 meeting now you’ll have 2 invites
Karen Hand
22:34
has anyone seen application of VC for workforce coming out of a smart city initiative?
jim stclair
23:06
Karen, great example
Drummond Reed
23:20
Karen, that’s a really good question. The Toronto smart city initiative has been looking at decentralized identity and VCs for awhile now, but I don’t know of anything referencable.
sankarshan
23:27
There’s work being done at Kochi (Kerala, India). Vinod Panicker out of Wipro and chair of UFWG is a contact.
Karen Hand
23:29
Yes, recognition of soft skills from employers
Drummond Reed
23:37
I also know Hong Kong is looking closely at ToIP on a city-wide basis
Karen Hand
23:39
thanks, great
Karen Hand
24:44
please send links to any initiatives, I sit on Smart City Data and Tech Advisory Board for City of Guelph and County of Wellington - we won a Canadian wide competition
Kalyan Kulkarni
26:17
By the way, I think we have the Kochi Org Book presentation lined up in the upcoming Hyperledger Meetup on 21st this month
Karen Hand
26:23
Hi Drummond, yes we are aware of Toronto, sidewalk labs and have members from that initiative on our committees. Also working with the smart city initiative in Montreal - both we a focus on food and circular economy
Drummond Reed
30:24
Karen, excellent. I’d love to make sure our WG is addressing your needs for a ToIP-compatible governance framework for a smart city. I personally believe it’s an ideal set of use cases.
Karen Hand
34:06
Would agree. Governance is critical
Ken Adler
34:49
+1
Drummond Reed
35:23
Just having a checklist of risks for governance authorities at each layer would be a great deliverable from our WG
jim stclair
35:32
+1
Carly Huitema
35:42
+1, risk document is good. We should also say it is a starting point because individual use cases will have specific risks that we can't account for here.
Tom Plagge
41:18
I agree, it’s great! It does seem suggestive of a certification/audit process, too.
jim stclair
42:52
There will be ultimately some grounds for certification/audit
sankarshan
45:15
Scott & David - please review the decision as recorded on meeting agenda. I want to ensure that my clumsy transcribing isn’t making it worse
sankarshan
45:26
*Scott Perry (sorry)
Scott Perry
45:53
Looks good
sankarshan
47:13
https://wiki.trustoverip.org/display/HOME/ToIP+Governance+Metamodel
Kalyan Kulkarni
01:10:49
I think for now, we can have bi-weekly meeting while specific TFs may have dedicated meeting in between to accomplish the work or brainstorm as the need be.
Karen Hand
01:11:38
thanks all