Zoom Logo

Secure Data Storage - scoping #1 - (Superfriends) - Shared screen with speaker view
Ed Goode
10:42
Fixed
Daniel Buchner
11:54
Balázs can cover everything
Balazs Nemethi
15:51
balazs@identity.foundation
Manu
16:49
Charter - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lYEWdDOm1iyCN9q_AkHE3bQ_SDjhwHDYWp73a73F4M8/edit#
Manu
17:01
Use Cases - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lYEWdDOm1iyCN9q_AkHE3bQ_SDjhwHDYWp73a73F4M8/edit#
Manu
17:50
Use Cases - https://docs.google.com/document/d/18UdEjA2kQRnILnBEnWijNho0YMJ93dbjKntx0NQzapI/edit#
Daniel Buchner
19:18
quantum computing attacks
Daniel Buchner
19:24
sounds more accurate
Orie Steele (Transmute)
20:00
Also defense against the dark arts… we need that too.
Daniel Buchner
20:30
NSAnpe
Orie Steele (Transmute)
21:39
DID URLs are underdevelopment at W3C.
Daniel Buchner
22:00
I think if we are targeting HTTP/REST API support that it would translate well to DID URLs anyway
Daniel Buchner
22:09
can't imagine why that wouldn't work
Orie Steele (Transmute)
22:26
q+
Balazs Nemethi
24:05
q is empty
Tobias Looker
25:32
+1 to Ories point
Daniel Buchner
26:52
would affect implementation against other transports
Daniel Buchner
26:59
cool
Juan Caballero
27:08
out of scope: actively ensuring compatibility or translatability with non-HTTP based interfaces ?
Daniel Buchner
29:23
That's how I read it too
Daniel Buchner
29:46
HTTP is the initial focus, but must consider all other non-HTTP protocols/transports in doing our work
Juan Caballero
29:48
nevermind
Daniel Buchner
29:57
^
Juan Caballero
29:59
I don't think i'm being helpful
Daniel Buchner
31:54
Hopefully the results aren't anon, so we can shame people
Daniel Buchner
31:59
as one does
Juan Caballero
32:18
some people are observing!
Ian Preston
32:44
I'm not seeing a poll in web client, but have no objections
Orie Steele (Transmute)
33:13
We did it fam!
Balazs Nemethi
33:21
Well done!
Daniel Buchner
33:30
The spec is basically done!
Orie Steele (Transmute)
33:45
rofl
Daniel Buchner
34:08
I think we should do 3, personally
Manu
39:16
Use Cases - https://docs.google.com/document/d/18UdEjA2kQRnILnBEnWijNho0YMJ93dbjKntx0NQzapI/edit#
Daniel Buchner
42:31
q+
Balazs Nemethi
42:52
q is Daniel
Balazs Nemethi
43:31
q is empty
Juan Caballero
54:17
poor Karyl
Dmitri Zagidulin
54:23
q+ to ask “what does censorship resistant” means
Balazs Nemethi
55:30
q is Dmitri
Balazs Nemethi
56:03
q is empty
Balazs Nemethi
58:25
FYI t-10 min
Juan Caballero
01:03:39
Cloud only?
Juan Caballero
01:03:56
just spitballin'\
Orie Steele (Transmute)
01:04:00
Yeah cloud only
Daniel Buchner
01:04:03
Yeah, because IOT would be cloud only
Daniel Buchner
01:04:23
IOT devices probably would not have enough storage to have any real instance locally
Eric Welton (Korsimoro)
01:04:32
I'd love to comment on the cloud-only as well
Ian Preston
01:04:41
What about a home based server?
Michael Shea
01:04:45
IoT could be either Cloud or local gateway
Juan Caballero
01:04:53
q?
Daniel Buchner
01:04:55
I think home-based server would fall under a user device
Steve Magennis
01:05:25
if you have cloud only, you probably also want a 'multi-cloud' option
Eric Welton (Korsimoro)
01:05:25
q+
Dmitri Zagidulin
01:05:41
q+ to propose 2.4 is the same as 2.5
Ian Preston
01:06:15
by home device don't mean a device that a user ever logs in to. Just one that stores/mirrors data for fast LAN access at home
Dmitri Zagidulin
01:06:36
q-
Kaliya Identity Woman
01:06:37
Has anyone proactively reached out to Kiva to engage with them.
Balazs Nemethi
01:06:47
T-1 min
Kaliya Identity Woman
01:06:48
they have done something like this
Balazs Nemethi
01:07:07
q is empty
Balazs Nemethi
01:07:33
Next call same time?Or Friday time?
Balazs Nemethi
01:08:02
Ok.
Juan Caballero
01:08:17
Thanks all!